My Movies For The Island

August 21st, 2010


Mark Zanzig

You have seen this question before: “If you were to move to a remote island alone, but could take a couple of movies with you, which movies would you bring? And why?”

Well, sitting on the patio in the summer heat of southern Germany, I thought I should pull together the reply for this question.

I started with a top-ten list of my favorite movies of all times, but it was not enough. At the end I need to take 30 movies.

Here they are:

  1. City Slickers
  2. L.A. Story
  3. Notting Hill
  4. The Rock
  5. Music & Lyrics
  6. Ocean’s 11
  7. Avanti!
  8. Ice Age
  9. Tomorrow Never Dies
  10. Love Actually
  11. Night on Earth
  12. Subway
  13. The First Wives Club
  14. Le Gendarme de St. Tropez
  15. Father of the Bride
  16. The Blues Brothers
  17. Casablanca
  18. Mickey Blue Eyes
  19. Against all flags
  20. Death on the Nile
  21. We’re No Angels
  22. It’s a Wonderful Life
  23. Annie Hall
  24. Witness For the Prosecution
  25. What’s Up, Doc?
  26. The Big Blue
  27. Jurassic Park
  28. That Man From Rio
  29. Pink Panther 2
  30. Simpsons – The Movie

So, on my island I would probably want to see comedy (66%) some of them with a romantic theme (21%) – fun and romance is probably missing on my island. Then I would want to see true classics (41%) and a couple of action thrillers but always with a tongue-in-cheek approach.

In terms of actors – I think I could not get tired of seeing Hugh Grant (4x), Steve Martin (3x), Peter Ustinov (2x), Humphrey Bogart (2x), and the always beautiful Julia Roberts (2x).

Those friendly folks over at the International Movie Database (IMDB) not only provide any imaginable information about each of the movies, no! They also allow rating. And I checked my movies for the island. The best rated movie is (at the time of writing) Casablanca with an average rating of 8.8 of 10, followed by It’s a Wonderful Life (8.7) and Witness of the Prosecution (8.3). The worst rated movies on my list are, sadly, Steve Martins Pink Panther 2 with an average of just 5.2 (entirely unjustified in my opinion), The First Wives Club (5.6), and Mickey Blue Eyes (5.7).  The overall average is 7.16 of 10 which does not say much about the quality at all.


IMDB ratings decline over the decades for my movie list

I also did some analysis that I wanted to share with you. I think it’s fun even if it is entirely useless knowledge.

  • Is older better? (1) – If you plot the ratings against the year of the first release and add a trend line, it seems that the ratings appear to decrease over time (see graph above).
  • Steve Martin – My three favorite movie with Steve Martin have all been rated below the average of 7.16.
  • True Classics – Of all the movies that I consider to be “true classics”, only one movie (Subway) has a rating below the average.
  • Is older better? (2) – The movies with the best ratings on my list have been released in 1942, 1946, 1957, 1977, and 1980.
  • Black & white – The top-three rated movies have all been filmed in black & white. These are the only movies in black & white on my list.

Anyway, over the coming months I will -whenever time permits- publish a review of the respective movie that’s next on the list. The only thing I need now – is a quiet island. ;-)

Note to self – Get DVDs for Casablanca, Against All Flags, Death on the Nile, We’re No Angels, It’s a Wonderful Life, Witness For The Prosecution, and That Man From Rio.

Disabling location-awareness

August 20th, 2010


Google Streetview Car in Zurich/Switzerland
Photo: Natalie Madani – Some rights reserved

It seems that every Internet company is jumping on the geo-location train now. OK, there was a fair bit of discussion over here in Germany about the perceived privacy intrusion by the Google spycars that capture both photos and WLAN information. It turned out that the Germans have begun to dislike the Orwellian “Do no evil” company from California. But also the new equally silly “Places” feature on Facebook seems to be made with those in mind who always wanted to become the obidient, fully transparent citizen. If however, you think that nobody except your closest friends should know where you are and what you do (like me), then you need to be aware of this development – and make a couple of changes.

Thanks to the always stunning Register, I actually realized that Firefox has implemented a feature called “Location-Aware Browsing”. Read all about it at the official Mozilla site. The most important item is the last one, “How do I turn off Location-Aware Browsing permanently?” I followed the steps to disable the feature permanently, and guess what? It was turned on by default. True, Location-Aware Browsing (apparently) will ask for permission before sending out location information, but the fact that the feature was enabled by default still puzzles me. (Further tips for setting up Firefox to reveal less information about you can be found here.)

And, those folks over at Facebook again managed to mess up with the privacy settings. Read all about it at The Register. An easy pictorial guide on how to disable this newest “feature” can be found at The Business Insider.

Good bye, Kodak PhotoCD

July 7th, 2010

It shimmers golden. The words “digital science”, “master disk”, and “Photographic Quality Images” are printed in pitch black on the golden disk and all suggest just: durability, quality, and value. The name Kodak implies experience from one of the pioneers in photography. I am talking about Kodak PhotoCD.


Mark Zanzig

Back in the 1990s, when digital cameras were just a weird fantasy of some photo geeks, the Kodak PhotoCD system promised to be one of the best mediums to archive your images. You tossed over two magazines filled with  slides and paid a small fortune, and you received a nice CD-ROM with all your slides in high-resolution. I own two dozen or so PhotoCDs, some of them filled with very good images. Even when CDs and DVDs became affordable I thought the PhotoCDs were still good for long-term storage of some of my older photos.

Well, I was wrong. Very wrong.

A couple of weeks ago I received the new Photoshop CS5. Like CS3, the software was unable to open Kodak PhotoCD files after installation, but while CS3 came with a nifty little import plug-in (to be found on the content disk in the “Goodies” folder), the new CS5 does not have that little tool, or in fact any of the “Goodies”. Yes, it’s hard to believe, but one of the most expensive (and complete) image post-processing softwares CAN NOT OPEN Kodak PhotoCDs any more. I don’t get it. Couldn’t Adobe just have purchased the import algo from Kodak for a couple of bucks? While I agree that there are probably just very few users of PhotoCD around, it is deeply depressing to see that all your PhotoCDs have turned into a pile of junk overnight.

If you do a search for this problem, you’ll come across very few solutions. What works for me, sort of, is Sandy McGuffog’s free pcdtojpeg tool for Windows. Unfortunately, it is a command line tool which means it is not for the faint hearted. One has to fiddle around with commands entered into a DOS box. No fancy previews, and no batch processing either. But who am I to complain? After all, it does work, even under Windows Vista 64. I should be happy. Now all I have to do is to write a script or something to batch-convert all my image files from the past.

PhotoCD, however, should be a lesson for all of us! The one million Dollar question is: Which format will be universally accessible in the future? Say, in 50 years from now? 100 years? (Not that anyone would be interested, but hey, who knows?). Here’s a list of candidates:

  • RAW – definitely not! We will be lucky if this proprietary format can be opened ten, fifteen years from now.
  • DNG – could be, but it makes me suspicious that the format seems to have undergone a couple of changes in its short life span already.
  • TIFF – probably, because it is an uncompressed image format that has survived since the early days of digital imaging (but it requires lots of storage).
  • JPEG – very likely as it is so popular and can be opened/used by almost any application on any computer.
  • PCD – yeah, Kodak, thank you very much for this one. Definitely not. ;-)

Well, only time will tell.

If after reading this, you still want to know more about Kodak PhotoCD, I’ll point you to Ted Felix’ PhotoCD Page where you can not just find technical information but also some background information on this outdated and obsolete format.

UPDATE 9/7/2010 – I realized I had AcdSee 6.0 installed on my old laptop, and this software not only provides a preview to the images, but it also can do a batch conversion to whatever format you want (and it’s quick, too). Nice.

How to shoot fireworks

July 5th, 2010

We’ve been off to the beautiful city of Kitzbühel in Austria for a weekend, and I shot a couple of photos. In the evening there were festivities of the local firebrigade, and part of this were fireworks. We had a beautiful view from our hotel, the excellent Schlosshotel Lebenberg, across the entire city, and this was the perfect location to capture them.


10 sec., f/11, ISO 400, Canon EOS 5D with EF 70-200/2.8L USM
Mark Zanzig/zettpress

For all of you who wonder how to capture fireworks, here is the simple guide:

1.) Find a location that puts the fireworks into perspective, i.e. that links them to a specific place. Beautiful fireworks are nice, but to see where it happened is much more exciting. (Always remember the real-estate agents: “Location, location, location!”)

2.) Get a tripod and -if possible- a remote control for your camera. You’re going to shoot very long exposures, which you will be unable to hold from hand. If you do not have a tripod available, find a solid and even spot to put the camera on and put the drive to self-exposure (ideally with 2 seconds count down).

3.) Prior to the fireworks, find a suitable crop for your image. You will need to guess how far up the fireworks will go so you can capture those beautiful round splashes against the dark sky.

4.) Set the camera to some low/medium ISO (100 to 400) to reduce noise.

5.) Set the camera to manual mode (M), and select an aperture between 8 and 16, and an exposure time between 5 and 10 seconds. And please do shoot in RAW mode.

6.) Still prior to the fireworks, do a couple of test shots to finetune your combination of exposure time, aperture and ISO. If the images turn out too dark, increase exposure time (up to 15 seconds is OK). If they are still too dark, reduce the aperture value (down to 5.6 is OK). Only if you still get images that are too dark, you should increase the ISO setting gently.

7.) Now the fireworks may begin! Try to get the rhythm of the shots. If possible, vary your crop between shots so you have a variety of shots and not just one.

Good luck!